In a landscape where battery companies often engage in competitive cycle life comparisons to promote their products, the comparison is not always fair.
At The Energy Company, we challenge this approach.
Rather than relying on comparative claims with estimated numbers of industry, we took a contrarian stance. We assembled two battery packs utilizing cells from the same manufacturer and same date of manufacturing—one integrated with our proprietary cooling stack and the other without.
Over the past year, both packs underwent continuous accelerated cycling with identical equipment at our state-of-the-art facility under the same conditions.
Both packs were charged and discharged at 1C continuously. While most batteries give up at 0.5C itself, enhancing the life at 1C is not an easy job by any imagination.
Nevertheless, the results speak for themselves.
LC1 vs LC2: Battery pack thermal management comparison
The Key Difference
LC1: Without Cooling
LC2: With TEC Cooling Stack
Regardless of the cell used, our innovative technology elevated the cycle life of the battery pack by an astounding 50%.
We take pride in presenting results that reflect a more accurate representation of our capabilities.
State of Health (SOH) degradation comparison over cycle life
So, what's the secret sauce?
Correction—It's the sheer determination of a team willing to push boundaries.
Join us on the journey towards groundbreaking advancements in battery technology!
Experience the Difference
See how our thermal management technology can extend your battery's life by 50%
Contact Our TeamThe effort spent in Cycle Life Setup & Data Analysis will be covered in Part 2.